Why has this massive story of global importance been removed from the Daily Mail Website? | _

Why has this massive story of global importance been removed from the Daily Mail Website? | _

The Daly Mail has a very good web site for normal news. I take a lot of their stuff for this site. I continually moan about them juxtaposing England for Britain and using England and Wales figures as being the whole of the Uk.
Now it would appear that they are guilty of censorship. All newspapers do this,so what's new? Any editor will pull a story after receiving a phone call from spooks or a Government department. They will even pull news stories on the promise of getting something better, later on. It happens all the time in every paper.
The Washington Post ran a famous front page story about naughty parties and the involvement of Government officials in homosexual activity, with children from a boy's home, at them. After phone calls, the story was pulled, but they have been pilloried ever since, as people downloaded the story when it first appeared.
The news is censored all the time. That's why we need the internet.
Recently papers have been running the Saville information which is being heavily censored. Papers recently mentioned the Elms Guest house,in London, as being a homosexual party house and saying that famous people had been there. They did not mention any names. On the internet, there is a handwritten list of guests, who stayed at the Elms, including Cliff Richard, Jess Conrad and Gordon Brown among others. It must be said that there is no proof that any of these people were involved in wrong doing, but why was the list not published, in the papers, instead of them hinting that famous singers and politicians had stayed there, without giving names??
They just hinted that an internationally known singer was currently abroad and would be interviewed on his return to the Uk. This was just a slur, with no proof ,to raise sales of later papers and for the public to play hunt the star. Had they been named as having been guests that would have ended the matter.